David Lemm seems very drawn to environments and landscapes, the way we interact and respond to them, and our relationship to our surroundings. He often 'maps' out places and experiences with his motifs and diagrams, and the way he does this is very interesting. The definition of these maps is a loose one, where it seems as though they are less focussed on where things are in relation to each other (like a traditional map) but they act more as a representation of what makes up a place, a collection of what elements build it up and how they can be visualised. This way of mapping reminds me of the sound maps we did at the start of the week; the experience is built up abstractly as a series of marks and lines and shapes, and is less about representing a physical object in a drawing but more about visualising a feeling or an emotion or a sense of something. They put no importance on accurate depictions and all importance on capturing visually, sometimes subjects that are not even physical at all, like experience.
These responses to landscapes and views are probably the most obvious depictions of physical forms, but created to feel more diagrammatic and abstract than simply drawing a mountain. Shape holds precedence, embellished with texture and pattern to create depth and layout, distinction between different elements, as well as physical textures and surfaces. The use of one colour perfectly compliments these textures and shapes, creating a contrast between the somewhat harsh forms of the rocks and bold mountain shapes.
I really love this map on the left. Aesthetically I find it very appealing and engaging, I think for it's systematic layout and border; the lines are regimented and contained within the box, they are free within it's space but still kept uniformed and controlled. This nicely juxtaposes the lighter map diagram in the background, the free and flowing forms of nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment